The Ethics of Eating Animals Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

The Ethics of Eating Animals - Research Paper ExampleTo understand the excuse for the annihilation of animals based on their lack of intelligence and feeling, consider the treatment of two domestic animals a dog and a sheep. The latter is considered to be less intelligent than the former in that respectfore it can be slaughtered for food while the former becomes mans best friend. In reality, the two are non very different in terms of mental abilities, however for humans to justify killing sheep they throw away to make them look stupid and in that respectfore deserving of death as opposed to dogs which deserve to racy based on their assumed intelligence. Furtherto a broader extent, even if one was to assume for arguments sake that some animals are to a considerableer extent intelligent than others, this is hardly reason enough to take away their duty to live. There is a great incongruity created by the inconsistency between the love for animals and the enjoyment of meat, rais ing concerns for animals rights activists who defend to contend with the fact that despite claiming to love animals, most people still enjoy meat. Clearly, nobody thinks nearly where meat comes from, the process it takes before reaching the consumer and the fact that human also has bodies resembling meat. There are many inconsistencies between beliefs and behaviors concerning meat eating hence, nobody is quite sure whether they are doing the right thing. To most civilize societies, eating the meat of a fellow human being is the epitome of savagery and primitiveness and it shows that those composite are evil and extremely immoral.... Furthermore, even if one was to assume for arguments sake that some animals are more intelligent than others, this is hardly reason enough to take away their right to live. There is a great incongruity created by the inconsistency between the love for animals and the enjoyment of meat, raising concerns for animals rights activists who put up to con tend with the fact that despite claiming to love animals, most people still enjoy meat. (Overal, 2012). Clearly, nobody thinks about where meat comes from, the process it takes before reaching the consumer and the fact that human also have bodies resembling meat. Wade (2000) argues that there are many inconsistencies between beliefs and behaviors concerning meat eating hence, nobody is quite sure whether they are doing the right thing. To most civilized societies, eating the meat of a fellow human being is the epitome of savagery and primitiveness and it shows that those involved are evil and extremely immoral. How true this is arguable, however, the same can be say of humans who kill animals for the sake of satisfying their craving for meat. At the end of the day, in both cases, there will be predation and destruction of living animals for food. In the case of modern man, it is even worse since there exists numerous alternatives to meet and they can survive comfortably without e ating meat as then many vegetarians do. For meat lovers to enjoy their fare, they mentally disengage their eating habits from the brutality and death that precedes their meal. One of the doer by which this is achieved is by disassociating the meat from the animal, for example eating pork not pig, or mutton not sheep, thereby they try to completely alienate the