Rhetorical Analysis Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

rhetorical Analysis Paper - Essay ExampleNotwithstanding, it is also accessible and comprehensible by the larger non-scientific participation of individuals and look forers who wish to keep themselves up to date about matters of the brains evolution. The writer attempts to explain the change magnitude capacity for the brains expansion by drawing from previous research by scientists as well as comparing the structure of the mankind brain with that of a nonher(prenominal) animals. That way, he provides sufficient footing for any reader to follow in his analysis of the human brain as he discusses its intrinsic workings and the various scenarios that could play out in its evolution. Logic has been used extensively in this publisher as it is has been written with heavy reference to empirical evidences, both from the writers perspective and ex post facto research by others. The writer has also inculcated pathos and ethos in an attempt to get the audiences emotionally involved as we ll as legitimizes his work by comparing and citing research by reputable scientists. Briefly, the paper makes a claim that physically, the human brain may have or may be about to fell its capacity for evolutionary expansion, Fox argues that while the conventional assumption would be that the brain would keep developing larger, this may not be applicable to humans. He considerers rat and elephant brains to show through juxtaposition of the colossal disparities, that the rat is essentially brighter than the jumbo. He posits that the most intelligent animals are those that squeeze out as much as possible from their brains and through this, humans are unequivocally dominant. Physical growth of the human brain, he argues, is unlikely to improve its performance because, while the bigger brain may be to a greater extent powerful, the extra power is likely to be dedicated to in-house running of the brain and not increasing intelligence. This is confirm by the fact that the elephants or cows brains are bigger than ours are, precisely they are particular(a) in their intelligence because most of the brain mass is dedicated to operating the brain itself (Fox 40). The writer dominantly applies a logical systematic strategy in which he presents his claim, and considers, while at the same time rationally disapproving, possible initial nonprofessional assumptions and responses to the claim. He then delves into technical examinations and includes graphical depictions backed by scientific data, ultimately he examines the different scenarios that would result in evolution, he suggests the thickening of neurons, but contends that it would to be compensate by making the brain slower by increasing axon length. He explores several other alternatives and in each case proves they are likely to impractical, he summarizes his argument by stating that the brain cannot expand, but the fact that expansion is likely to be counterproductive. After exploring the available options, he l eads the reader to a shoemakers last by suggesting the brain may not really need to grow anymore since through engineering science humans are able to utilize artificial intelligence such as writing and computing. Therefore, the replication of growth may already have been solved indirectly, since while the human brain may not expand very much, technology, which we use to boost our processing capacity, is expanding exponentially every day. The application of Ethos in this article transcends the writer